Trump Receives Praise from Republicans in Congress Following Strikes on Iran
After President Trump announced military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, he received immediate praise from Congressional Republicans while some Democrats expressed concerns about the constitutional implications of such actions. The swift endorsements reflect a divided yet deeply engaged political atmosphere surrounding U.S. military policy.
President Donald Trump has received significant support from Republicans in Congress after announcing military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday evening. According to reports, Congress members praised the decision, seeing it as a necessary action against a perceived threat. While some Democrats also voiced approval, such as Sen. John Fetterman from Pennsylvania, split opinions about military involvement in Iran remain evident among lawmakers.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was among the first to commend Trump, posting, “Well done, President Trump” on X. Texas Senator John Cornyn described the strikes as a “courageous and correct decision,” while Alabama’s Katie Britt called the strike “strong and surgical.” Oklahoma’s Markwayne Mullin asserted, “America first, always,” reflecting the general Republican sentiment.
Roger Wicker, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman from Mississippi, emphasized the gravity of the decision, stating that Trump had made an intentional choice to neutralize an existential threat. He noted, “we now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,” underlining the stakes involved in the military action.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed support, stating, “as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm’s way.” Both Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson were reportedly briefed prior to the strikes, which added weight to their endorsements.
In a statement, Johnson remarked that the operations should serve as a warning to adversaries, asserting that, “President Trump means what he says.” Similarly, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford expressed gratitude for the U.S. servicemembers who executed the strikes, calling them “precise and successful.”
However, not all reactions were in favor of military action. Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, known for his opposition to foreign military involvement, criticized the decision, stating, “This is not Constitutional.” Many Democrats, including Connecticut Representative Jim Himes, argued that Congress should have a say in authorizing military actions. Himes commented, “According to the Constitution we are both sworn to defend, my attention to this matter comes BEFORE bombs fall. Full stop,” amplifying the ongoing debate regarding the separation of powers in military decisions.
The reactions following President Trump’s announcement of military strikes on Iran reflect broad Republican support. While many praised the decision as necessary to counteract terrorism, there are notable dissenting voices, particularly among those advocating for congressional oversight. This latest action underscores the complexities of U.S. military engagement and the divided response from lawmakers across both parties.
Original Source: apnews.com
