Trump Allies Accuse ‘Mossad Agents’ of Sabotaging Iran Negotiations
Allies of former President Trump are accusing ‘Mossad agents’ and ‘warmongers’ of undermining negotiations with Iran. Comments by Tucker Carlson and Clayton Morris suggest a divide within Trump’s administration over foreign policy. The Republican Party exhibits a notable shift in views towards Israel, reflecting growing skepticism. Amid ongoing diplomatic negotiations, contradictions within Trump’s team present challenges for the future of U.S.-Iran relations.
In a dramatic turn of events, allies of former President Donald Trump are accusing “Mossad agents” and “warmongers” of trying to undermine negotiations with Iran. This accusation is not emerging from Tehran’s state-run media but from some of Trump’s staunchest backers in the U.S. conservative sphere. Last week, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson highlighted the removal of Dan Caldwell, a senior Defense Department official, suggesting his ouster was linked to his perceived hindrance to military action against Iran.
Carlson claimed Caldwell was unfairly branded a “traitor” after voicing foreign policy views that diverged from what he termed the mainstream rhetoric of Washington warmongers. Caldwell’s dismissal came amidst allegations that he leaked classified information regarding Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s use of a communication platform. Observers note that Carlson’s narratives reflect his unique access to Trump, influencing public discourse significantly.
On another front, Clayton Morris, a former Fox News anchor turned podcaster, has asserted that pro-Israel advocates are actively working against Trump’s “anti-war” personnel at the Pentagon. Despite not naming any specific individuals, Morris’s comments raise alarm over alleged involvement from former Israeli intelligence operatives in discrediting Trump’s advisors. There is a growing division within Trump’s administration; some officials favor traditional Republican stances while others, like the White House chief of staff and national intelligence director, align with the “America First” ideology.
The recent firing of Caldwell and two other Pentagon officials has seemingly emboldened the isolationist faction, marking a striking shift from the Republican Party’s traditionally hawkish stance. This faction has increasingly criticized figures like Merav Ceren, recently nominated to advise on Iran and Israel, who has a background in the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Critics have voiced concerns about Ceren’s dual citizenship as reflective of a broader shift in how certain factions within the GOP view longstanding alliances.
Attitudes towards Israel are changing in the U.S., particularly among younger Republicans. A recent Pew Poll indicates that 53% of Americans now hold unfavorable views of Israel, a significant rise from earlier years, suggesting a shift that is echoed in popular conservative media outlets. Morris and Carlson have cultivated audiences that resonate with this skepticism, especially amidst heightened conflicts in the region, including the recent unrest following Hamas attacks.
As Trump navigates foreign policy pressures, there remains inconsistent messaging from his advisors. For instance, Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff initially suggested a possible diplomatic route allowing low-level uranium enrichment for Iran but soon retracted after criticism from pro-Israel advocates, insisting on a complete halt to Iranian nuclear activities. Trump’s recent remarks about Iran negotiations indicated optimism, suggesting that a deal may be on the horizon without resorting to military action.
Amid these unfolding developments, it is becoming increasingly clear that the internal divisions within Trump’s circle and shifting public sentiments towards Iran and Israel signal a markedly different Republican Party than in previous decades. The future of U.S.-Iran relations may depend on how these contradictions play out amidst ongoing diplomatic efforts.
The prevailing narrative among Trump’s allies highlights an ongoing struggle within the Republican Party regarding foreign policy, specifically concerning Iran. Accusations against pro-Israel figures suggest a radical shift towards isolationism. The in-fighting and skepticism surrounding longstanding alliances indicate that both political dynamics and public opinions are in flux. As diplomatic talks progress, the direction of U.S.-Iran relations remains uncertain, colored by internal Republican debates and changing perceptions of foreign involvement.
Original Source: www.middleeasteye.net
