Armenian Positive Neutrality in Lebanon: Continuity and Evolution

The Armenian community in Lebanon has practiced positive neutrality since the Lebanese Civil War, uniting different political factions to protect communal interests amid conflict. The policy has evolved in response to local and regional developments, particularly during times of crisis, while preserving its core principle of neutrality. The future will depend on the community’s ability to adapt its strategies in a changing political climate.

Throughout the Lebanese Civil War, the Armenian community in Lebanon adopted a policy of positive neutrality, primarily aimed at safeguarding dialogue, security, and political stability with various sectarian groups. This commitment arose from the group’s dedication to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Despite differing political ideologies, the three Armenian political parties—Tashnak, Hunchak, and Ramgavar—joined forces to protect the community’s interests during the wartime turmoil.

Armenian neutrality has historical roots dating back to the 1915 Armenian Genocide, which necessitated the resettlement of thousands of refugees in the Middle East. In pursuit of security, the Armenian community largely abstained from sectarian disputes and maintained a non-aligned stance during the Lebanese Civil War. Throughout hostilities, the focus remained on protecting sovereign Lebanese territory and preserving Armenian cultural identity, including language and educational institutions.

In the post-civil war era, the commitment to positive neutrality continued as the Armenian community engaged in more pragmatic alliances over strict ideological ties. The assassination of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005 led to a polarized Lebanese political landscape, challenging the community’s neutrality. While the Hunchaks and Ramgavars leaned towards the March 14 alliance and the Tashnaks towards the March 8 bloc, Armenian political representation remained moderate.

Simultaneously, Armenian organizations like the Apostolic Church played a pivotal role in fostering a stable cultural identity, particularly during Lebanon’s economic strife. Leadership emphasized a balanced political approach, prioritizing community interests while minimizing conflict with other societal factions. This strategy helped the Armenian community maintain its positive neutrality amidst Lebanon’s complex political arena.

However, external conflicts, such as the Syrian Civil War and the Lebanese financial crisis, have complicated this policy. The influx of Syrian Armenian refugees and changing demographics raised concerns regarding communal resource allocation. Recent protests and the Beirut Port explosion further exacerbated hardships for the Armenian community, prompting its institutions to act decisively while maintaining their neutral stance.

Armenian positive neutrality in Lebanon has historically served as a crucial mechanism for community survival amid political upheavals. Although foundational aspects of this policy remain, evolving regional and local dynamics necessitate strategic adaptations. The future of Armenian neutrality hinges upon the community’s capacity to balance enduring principles of security and stability with Lebanon’s fluctuating political landscape. The community faces challenges, yet it is essential for its long-term survival to prioritize stability and the preservation of identity.

Original Source: armenianweekly.com