Reasons Behind the US and Argentina’s Withdrawal from the WHO

The United States and Argentina have both announced intentions to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), citing concerns over the organization’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and political influences, with the US initially attempting to exit under Donald Trump and Argentina following under President Javier Milei.

The United States, the largest financial contributor to the World Health Organization (WHO), declared its intention to withdraw from the organization on January 20, 2017, coinciding with President Donald Trump’s inauguration. The Trump administration cited the WHO’s perceived bias towards China, arguing that it downplayed the COVID-19 pandemic’s severity and delayed the declaration of a global health emergency. Moreover, it expressed concerns that the funds provided by the US were not used effectively within the organization. In contrast, the Biden administration reversed this withdrawal plan shortly after taking office.

Similarly, Argentina announced its intention to withdraw from the WHO under President Javier Milei. On February 5, a spokesperson for Milei communicated the country’s concerns regarding the WHO’s handling of health matters, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. They also pointed out the organization’s perceived lack of independence from political influences of other nations as a significant issue contributing to their decision.

The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a crucial role in global health governance. Its effectiveness has been questioned, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The United States, as a key financier, has consistently raised concerns regarding the WHO’s actions and affiliations, especially in relation to China. Recent political changes and the emergence of new leadership in countries like Argentina reflect ongoing scrutiny and dissatisfaction with the WHO’s performance amid global health crises.

The intentions of both the United States and Argentina to withdraw from the WHO stem from critical views on the organization’s handling of health issues and perceived political influences. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to underscore the importance of global health cooperation, such withdrawals highlight significant fractures in international public health collaboration that may have far-reaching implications.

Original Source: globalsouthworld.com