Sudan’s Military Rallies as Civil War Escalates Amid International Influence
Sudan’s military regained control of the presidential palace, marking a significant victory in the civil war against paramilitary forces. International support from Russia and Iran has strengthened the army, enabling recent battlefield successes. However, the conflict continues, exacerbating an already severe humanitarian crisis. Accusations against various regional powers further complicate the conflict, as civilians endure ongoing violence and instability.
Recently, Sudan’s military regained control of the presidential palace in Khartoum, marking a significant victory in its ongoing civil war against rival paramilitary forces. The armed forces released footage of troops celebrating inside the palace, which was heavily damaged from previous conflicts. While this victory is significant, it does not signify the end of the war, as the fighting continues for control of the capital.
The army’s resurgence is attributed to increased support from international allies, including weapons and resources from Russia and Iran. These contributions have enabled the army to strengthen its offensive strategies, leading to recent battlefield successes. In contrast, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) appear to have overstretched their capabilities and are facing logistical challenges.
The civil conflict in Sudan originated from a power struggle between Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Gen Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, leading to widespread violence and destruction. The humanitarian crisis has escalated, with millions displaced and casualties estimated between 150,000 and 500,000. Various regional powers have intervened, complicating the situation as they seek to further their strategic interests.
Accusations have emerged regarding the involvement of the United Arab Emirates in supporting the RSF against the Sudanese army, which the UAE denies. Conversely, the Sudanese army’s outreach to historical allies has been aimed at resurrecting military support amidst their earlier defeats. Former U.S. chargé d’affaires Alberto Fernandez noted the contrasting approaches of Western powers and countries like Russia and Iran regarding support with military supplies.
Moscow, initially playing both sides, has aligned itself with the Sudanese army as it pursued establishing a naval base near Port Sudan. Tehran has also renewed its support, aiming to extend its influence in the region. Reports indicate that both nations have supplied advanced technology, including drones, which have influenced combat dynamics.
Despite early setbacks, the army’s recent reorganizations and recruitment efforts have allowed them to gain the upper hand. An army officer detailed these changes, admitting their initial lack of readiness for conflict but citing significant increases in manpower since then. Analysts emphasize that while foreign technology has been beneficial, the army’s ability to mobilize local support has been paramount.
The establishment of a naval base deal with Russia raises concerns regarding its geopolitical implications. Despite the shifting balance of power, both sides have faced accusations of civilian abuses, further complicating public perception of the ongoing conflict. Residents in Khartoum continue to endure unpredictable and perilous living conditions amidst the violence, fearing for their safety.
In summary, the recent victory of Sudan’s military at the presidential palace highlights a notable shift in power dynamics within the ongoing civil conflict. The successful re-establishment of alliances with international supporters, particularly from Russia and Iran, has significantly bolstered military capabilities, while the RSF struggles to maintain control. However, the humanitarian crisis continues to worsen, with both factions facing scrutiny for their actions. As the situation evolves, the implications for peace and stability in Sudan remain uncertain.
Original Source: www.telegraph.co.uk
