Expert Claims Turkey is a Sponsor of Terrorism: Implications for India
Michael Rubin, a Middle East expert, argues that Turkey is a significant sponsor of terrorism, particularly affecting India’s security interests. He discusses the Kurdish issue, Turkey’s relationship with Pakistan, and advocates for India’s proactive diplomatic engagement. The prevailing view in U.S. Congress is turning more critical of Turkey, suggesting a shift in international attitudes towards Ankara’s actions.
In a comprehensive interview with IANS, Michael Rubin, a prominent Middle East analyst, discusses Turkey’s role as a supporter of terrorism and its growing alliance with Pakistan, highlighting the implications for India. Rubin, affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute, emphasizes that Turkey’s actions, particularly regarding Kashmir, necessitate a strong response from India. He presents Turkey as a nation that continues to engage in terrorism while reinforcing its stance in geopolitical conflicts.
Rubin elaborates on the Kurdish issue in Turkey, noting that Abdullah Ocalan’s calls for disarmament are likely made under duress, given his long imprisonment. He asserts that the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has diversified its leadership and strategic approach due to Ocalan’s lack of control. Rubin observes that while Ocalan’s words may resonate, the PKK is under significant pressure from Turkish actions, limiting their willingness to cease hostilities.
Examining the historical context, Rubin compares Ocalan’s situation to that of Nelson Mandela, highlighting that the circumstances in Turkey differ significantly. He challenges Turkey’s approach to the Kurdish question, questioning if it will allow for genuine political engagement and reconciliation under President Erdogan’s leadership.
Rubin encourages India to utilize the ongoing Kurdish struggle as a diplomatic counter to Turkey’s influence, suggesting that supporting the Kurds could mitigate threats from Turkey and Pakistan. He underscores that Erdogan’s ideologically driven actions reinforce his commitment to supporting insurgent movements in Kashmir, thus framing India’s strategic response as crucial in this dynamic.
The expert asserts that India must adopt a more assertive diplomatic stance, considering its potential as a global leader. He argues that India should adjust its strategy based on adversarial actions, pointing to successful measures like cross-border airstrikes against Pakistani aggression as a model for potential responses.
Rubin further explores the West’s perception of Turkey, identifying divisions in attitudes towards Ankara between the U.S. and Europe. He notes that while past administrations have displayed nuanced views on Turkey, the sentiment in Congress has shifted towards skepticism about Turkey’s intentions and actions. The call for designating Turkey as a state sponsor of terrorism is echoed, reflecting a growing consensus in U.S. political circles.
In conclusion, Michael Rubin provides vital insights into Turkey’s geopolitical role, the Kurdish situation, and India’s strategic options. His analysis suggests that addressing Turkey’s sponsorship of terrorism through a more assertive diplomatic and military posture may be essential for India’s national security.
Michael Rubin’s interview sheds light on Turkey’s persistent role as a sponsor of terrorism, particularly concerning India and its strategic interests. He analyzes the Kurdish situation under Abdullah Ocalan and urges India to adopt a proactive diplomatic stance against Turkey and Pakistan’s alliances. The shifting dynamics in the U.S. Congress regarding Turkey highlight a growing recognition of its behavior as increasingly hostile. The onus is on India to refine its strategies in response to these geopolitical challenges.
Original Source: www.thehansindia.com
